Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
Genocidal legalism: Nazi crime coverup bill ft Jewish Nazi regime
--
The Jewish Nazi regime has a law proposal that criminalizes cooperation with the International Criminal Court (ICC) in Hague. It calls ICC antisemitic, treats it as a literal Terrorist (under Anti-Terrorism Law), treats its funds as proceeds of Money laundering (under Prohibition of Money Laundering law), want to give life imprisonment to anyone giving ICC important evidence against its crimes, and anyone else providing ICC any other assistance to be deserving of 5 year jail term.
Of course, the Nazi regime claims it has a "law-abiding" (true, abiding to Nazi laws) so called "independent & impartial" judiciary, with "no-equal in the world" (everyone agrees, as that Nazi regime is one of a kind in modern world & protecting its Nazi crimes require special Nazi legal "skills"). Of course, it says, its doing all of that to protect — I shit you not — to defend "rule of law", to protect right to "fair trial" …
It follows proud tradition of its genocidal master i.e Empire as its inspiration to threaten members of ICC incl "use of force" & "by any means necessary" i.e murdering/harming/threaten to murder/harm Judges in ICC (or) anyone who aids ICC. It says it took inspiration from its genocidal master & its genocidal collaborator i.e Empire in composing this bill. If someone in Entity commits same crimes what Entity is committing, but not as part of the current ongoing genocide that benefits Entity i.e massacre & steal Palestinian land, well, those crimes are excluded from this Nazi crime coverup bill for mysterious reasons.
This Nazi regime, as a matter of ground reality, already controls whole of Palestine incl Gaza, hence this law (not sure if its already passed or not) will be applicable to Palestinians within Entity, East Jerusalem, West Bank & Gaza. So if a Palestinian cooperates with ICC in the investigation of Jewish Nazi crimes, they can be given 5 year jail term (or) life-sentence depending on the whims of World's Best [Nazi] Judiciary™ they got. They dont even need these farce laws to kidnap, torture, rape & massacre Palestinians, but this law is for future, incase if its not able to kidnap/rape/torture/massacre many Palestinian groups like it can now.
These Nazis have written law to criminalize ICC investigations against its conduct. OG Nazis look like noobs when compared to the degrees to which this modern Nazi regime when it comes to legalism. Nazis at the top in Entity carved out an exception for themselves, to throw lower level Nazis under the bus, if they can get themselves off the hook.
Lets dig into the details.
The title of the proposed law is:
Protection of Israeli Public Officials from the Action of the International Criminal Court in The Hague against the State of Israel.
If anyone cooperates with ICC & delivers any evidence against its crimes, they can be given upto life imprisonment if the evidence is important (so called "classified").
> A person delivering information to the Criminal Court in The Hague in the framework of an action or acting on behalf of or for the Court … shall be liable to five years' imprisonment, unless he has proved that he was not aware that the matter was for the purpose of an action of the Criminal Court in The Hague; for the purpose of this section, "was aware" includes if he suspected this but failed to clarify it; if the information was classified, he is liable to life imprisonment.
If anyone provides a service to ICC for investigation (not providing evidence, but mere services, can be as small as a clerk that aids with typing), that "crime" is deserving of 5 years imprisonment.
> A person who grants a service to the Criminal Court in The Hague … shall be liable to five years' imprisonment …
It treats resources ICC uses to conduct investigation as funds classified under Terrorism law.
> (D) An order issues regarding an asset in accordance with section (C) is regarded as an asset for the purpose of the provisions of section 56 of the Anti-Terrorism Law …
It classifies the funds ICC uses towards investigation as Money Laundering.
> (B) An asset of the Criminal Court in The Hague situated in Israel is considered a prohibited asset for the purpose of the Prohibition of Money Laundering Law …
Gave itself the power to steal resources of ICC & assets of anyone who cooperate with ICC.
> (C) The Minister is entitled, by order, to instruct the temporary seizure of an asset of the Court, or the restriction of use or restriction of transfer of rights thereto …
Evidence of its Nazi crimes, are "legally" hidden & are excluded from being demanded under so called "Freedom of Information" law.
> In order to prevent the circumvention of the limitations according to this law through requests to the authorities under the Freedom of Information Law, 5758-2018, and since in the Freedom of Information Law there is no obligation to state the reason for a person's request, this indirect amendment to the Freedom of Information Law states that information intended for the actions of the Criminal Court in The Hague will not be provided, and that the applicant will be required to declare if the information requested by him is required for the benefit of the actions of the Court.
But the Nazis at the top of the food chain have carved out an exception for themselves i.e If they can be let go off the hook of ICC, they can throw others under the bus. Thats THE ONLY exception to this Nazi crime coverup law.
> There is a single exception to these conditions: Where the authorized entity believes that the delivery of information or the approval of a particular request is required for the protection of a person or for the advancement of Israel's efforts to bring about the cancellation or mitigation of the activity against, the relevant minister in the government may approve its delivery/execution despite possible harm to the state's security or foreign relations. The authorized entity may also approve the delivery of a specific type of information or action.
If anyone is dissatisfied with the coverup in the Nazi regime, it prohibits disgruntled from taking their case to the ICC.
> it is possible that the Criminal Court in The Hague may request the assistance of individuals or organizations in Israel for the purpose of actions against Israel, including through the collection of information about various officials and the collection of testimonies and evidence. This state of affairs, in which Israeli elements work to harm officials, IDF soldiers, and public servants, is extremely problematic, and even has the potential to harm the rule of law in Israel, since parties who are not satisfied with the determinations of the enforcement agencies and the courts will appeal to attack these decisions before the Criminal Court in The Hague. Therefore, this part seeks to establish restrictions on the conduct of individuals before the court.
Prohibits anyone from coming into, provide evidence to, aid in the investigation of its genocidal crimes.
> … a foreign individual acting on behalf of the Criminal Court in The Hague, providing a service to the Criminal Court in The Hague concerning an action or doing anything liable to assist the Criminal Court in The Hague in its action, shall not be granted a visa or permit to be present in Israel in accordance with the Entry to Israel Law …
These pathological lying Nazis say, while they conduct genocide, they are taking such precautions to save the lives of Palestinians, and these precautions go beyond even international law, but they still need to protect themselves from international law.
> … [Nazi regime follows] far stricter approach than is required by law and international practice regarding the laws of war and humanitarian matters …
They need to protect themselves because, ICC is exploiting poor innocent Nazi regime.
> … anti-moral standards of the Court and the cynical and evil exploitation of the legal-moral cloak …
Also because ICC is antisemitic.
> … in order to continue the anti-Semitic tradition of harming Israel and the Jewish people, due to profound hatred, economic-political interests or both together.
contd.
@palestine @lebanon @iran @israel @syria #israel #palestine #gaza #lebanon #iran #syria #anarchy #anarchism #law #lawfedi @law
Also, Nazi regime has world's best Nazi legal "tradition".
> … State of Israel is a law-abiding with an independent legal system and a strong tradition of judicial review of its actions. There is no equal in the world for the scope of judicial review exercised by the Supreme Court, in its capacity as a High Court of Justice, on actions related to combat, and the law enforcement system performs its function impartially …
Ofcourse, its only protecting "constitutional rights" of Nazis to engage in Nazism.
> … constitutional rights of those who have worked in the service of the State of Israel, and above all the right to a fair trial, will be violated within the framework of such procedures [in ICC] … the proceedings before the Court lack the necessary balances to protect the security of the State of Israel, which are required when it seeks to the investigation and prosecution of sensitive security issues. … the confidentiality of classified evidence and the procedures for submitting it will be at the discretion of foreign parties who are not committed to the safety and security of the State of Israel.
This "law" to shield Nazis is there to protect "rule of law".
> … This action also poses a real danger to the rule of law in Israel, as there is a fear that parties who do not accept the decisions of the judicial system will circumvent these decisions by turning to the Court. Lastly, there is also a fear that Israeli citizens will act against other citizens in order to prosecute them at the Court.
The law only exists to protect the innocent Nazis who dint do nothing (except say genocide, ethnic cleansing, rapes, war crimes, crimes against humanity, …).
> … this bill is essential to protect IDF soldiers, public servants, and elected officials from the actions of the Court against them, by preventing the unauthorized action of the Court on Israeli territory, controlling the transfer of information to the Court authorities, and prohibiting the granting of services and assistance to the court …
Nazi regime took inspiration from other settler-colonial genocidal thug i.e Empire, to compose this bill, and its okay to engage in murder (so called "use of force" & "by any means necessary").
> It should be noted that due to reasons similar to those for which Israel did not join the Rome Statute, the USA also chose not to join it, and even enacted in 2002 the American Service-Members' Protection Act (hereinafter the AMSP), which, among other provisions, prohibited cooperation by the US government authorities and courts with the Court authorities, the conduct of investigations by the Court on US soil, and even authorized the US president to take actions to protect every American and US allies against proceedings before the Court, including even the use of force.
> This section obligates the state authorities to act by any means at their disposal against the Court in The Hague due to the actions of the Criminal Court in The Hague against the State of Israel or its citizens. It is also proposed to oblige the government to act for the release of a person from the Court by any means necessary.
Same crimes done by Nazis, but if its not in the furtherance of genocide & ethnic cleansing, this law doesnt apply. How merciful.
> … does not address actions of the Court in other contexts, including war crimes or crimes against humanity committed by an Israeli outside the framework of service for the benefit of the State of Israel …
Its only protecting "right to fair trial", by denying the ability of everyone to uncover its crimes.
> … It is proposed to clarify that the law is intended to provide institutional protection against the activity of the Court, due to the Court's intention to impose its authority on Israel, the fear of harming the right of Israelis to a fair trial, and the harm to the rule of law in Israel. …
> It is proposed to order the prohibition of serving documents on behalf of the Court, without the approval of the authorized entity. The section seeks to prevent the advancement of legal proceedings against those who acted on behalf of the State of Israel by serving documents into his hands, such as Court orders, subpoenas for investigation, and so forth.
Sanctions against ICC.
> Addresses the possibility of establishing sanctions against the Criminal Court in The Hague, including preventing its persons from entering Israel and banning economic activity.
Prohibits any Nazi being taken to ICC to face upto their genocidal crimes.
> It is proposed to prohibit the extradition of a person to the Court … this section may not be conditioned.
All in the service of pursuing the noble goal of shielding Nazi criminals from accountability.
> It is proposed to prohibit parties on behalf of the Court and any party that assists it from undertaking any action in the territory of the State of Israel, including gathering information and evidence against Israelis.
> This will prevent various parties in Israel from maintaining interfaces with the court without understanding the framework in which the Court operates and the risks posed by it, so that they are liable - even without their knowledge - to support the Court's actions against Israelis.
> The section is intended to ensure that a person receives notification from the state authorities regarding the Court's action against him. This warning will allow a person to take into account risks arising from the Court's activity against him, including when traveling to member states of the Rome Statute, where he may be arrested and interrogated, as well as in his daily conduct.
> … this part grants authority to prohibit the entry of the Court's officials into Israel, to prohibit the possession of assets and funds of the Court in Israel, and to prevent engagement with those who provide services to the Criminal Court in The Hague;
> It is proposed to grant the authority to withhold visas to enter or be present in Israel to the persons of the Criminal Court in The Hague, but also to foreign elements that provide services to the Court in its activities vis-à-vis the State of Israel. If they were granted a visa, this may be revoked.