Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
A little thread about Maa'm theater (new establishment of Empire)
She blaming the "outsiders" (those who called her out, just like how State goons & rest of ruling class blame "outsiders" for protests by peasants) because of her support for Genocide, Empire's crimes & Jewish Nazism.
Atleast she acknowledges her theater is a gig (a more cushy gig I must add) that comes with unjust power (like she has) & great perks she gets from the "gig".
The fakery of Maa'm needs study.
By "tough votes", she means, not something that hurt her personally, but something that hurt subject population.
Also the "tough votes" is siding with the crimes of Empire, impose her will will over everyone unjustly & siding with establishment so she can have a seat at the table in centers of power.
Also, this aids in her political career to become next Nancy Pelosi.
Maa'm is willing to work "across the aisle" (where did we hear this before?).
As per Maa'm, Crimes of State, Fascism & Capitalism are mere misunderstandings that requires more talking with Fascists who apparently are too stupid to know what they are celebrating & want to inflict on others who are worse off is evil.
The problem with fascists is not "communication gap". Anyone who thinks fascism is due to mere "communication gap" dont understand what fascism is.
A racist bigot at the bottom of pyramid doesnt need coddling. If someone can be evil on his own, he is smart enough to know whats wrong too. He doesnt need "better understanding". He need to know his bigotry is wrong & working with others who are already in bad situation is to his benefit. We dont have to be nice to bigots in order to not hurt his fellings.
Fuck him. He has enough intelligence to know whats right & wrong. We dont have to treats racist bigots like they are a snow flake.
What "attacks" is he talking about?
Some political opponent insulting her?
What harm did she suffer?
Did she lose her job? Some serious financial/physical/harm to her quality of life?
The interviewer is the "law and order", "tough on crime" variety. He's talking about "criminals", "terrorists" and so on. Wants to attack far-right from their right?
She being the bullshit merchant she is, thinks the Nazi regime thats ruling now, is not successful when it comes to deportations. All those migrants in the crosshairs of Nazis & Nazi State, its their headache as per Maa'm.
Is she also trying to fight far-right by attacking them from their right?
She's promoted by establishment assholes like him, says everything you need to know about new establishment. The guy who interviewing her right now is the one who promoted fashlib Nazis that committed genocide in recent elections & he feels at home promoting new establishment that Maa'm represents.
Why should anyone care whether the ruling class judicial goons are so-called "independent" or not? They are "independent" of who & what?
The "law" is not independent. It is written by and for those who control state (the moneybags, the bureaucrats & rest of the vested interests).
The people who appointed to so called "Justice" department are appointed by those who control power centers.
So the so-called "neutrality" & "independence" of law (or) those "neutrality" & "independence" of those who enforce it is a false argument to begin with.
So why should anyone care about so called "independence"?
Half dead Nazi-zombie literally pardoned his son & many others before he left office. So much for "independence" & "neutrality" of law I guess.
Law is written by those who control politics (indirectly via so-called "Justices"). So any pretense that it is independent of politics is a shameless lie (or) ignorant opinion.
Viewing the problems in society from the point of view of taxation is extremely problematic.
The problem is not what tax is being collected & what tax is not being collected.
The root of the problem has always been who is making decisions and who is not allowed to make the decisions about resource allocations.
If our worldview is constrained by just the dynamic of taxation, we'll continue to propose the wrong solutions to the deeper problems that exist.
The "taxation" theses that she talks about is only valid so long we operate within the narrow constraints we are forced to look at the world from. State has the monopoly on the money printer. It prints enough to give to the right people, but it doesnt have it when it comes to those at the bottom. Thats exposed clearly when we look at European ruling class & Defence spending in general & State giving free money to scam artists calling themselves so-called "job creators". In Europe, they are planning to move the money printer prints for goon squads completely outside so-called "balancing [the budget]".
The abstractions ruling class wants us to focus on are false abstractions, as state literally controls the money printer. The problem is not state issuing the money (atleast within societies that are run by a State) but who gets a sizable portion of that money ultimately.
The problem is how that money is distributed & ultimately who got unfair proportion & who did not get any — after all the roundtrips.
The "us" part (as in "none of us") is a serious problem, because she belongs to ruling class, not "us" (as in avg person on the street in Empire).
You literally enable genocides.
AOC and Bernie's continued membership of the Democrats serves to lend the party a legitimacy that it doesn't deserve, and moreover the two of them seem perfectly happy playing their roles as token socialists and in terms of demacating the line re Leftwing discourse that it's unacceptable to go beyond. They're integral, important parts of the neoliberal system.