ELLIOTTCABLE<p>anyway, the last bit from my notes, is a bit more personal:</p><p>I’ve always been harping, for years, on how <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/OCaml" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>OCaml</span></a> and <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/JavaScript" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>JavaScript</span></a> VMs are just such a surprisingly-fantastic, low-impedance match (see the whole <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/Melange" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Melange</span></a>, <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/BuckleScript" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>BuckleScript</span></a>, <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/ReScript" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>ReScript</span></a>, category — they&#39;re _fantastic_ to use in practice); …</p><p>but now i’m learning that Wasm is … basically OCaml’s semantics, EVEN MORE DIRECTLY, in a bunch of cases, lmao.</p>