peer review, student journal, advice wanted
@insaneinthemembrane Thanks! This is more or less what I have settled with. I already indicate 'must revise's and 'could revise's, but I worry that my suggested revisions will clash with the author's goals in the paper (the final section, which I think contains what their main objective is, is the most problematic, so I tend to think that the best course of action would be to rewrite or drop all of that, and focus on earlier sections).
A collective effort to offer federated social media to anarchist collectives and individuals in the fediverse. Registrations are open. Kolektiva.social is made by anarchists and anti-colonialists, for the social movements and for liberation!