Follow

Reminder that this is the chart shows the carbon reduction that we are expected to believe the state and capitalism can somehow pull off.

@anarchistbicycleclub
lol, ya, there is no way carbon emissions are going down that precipitously, even in the case of "civilizational collapse", "total revolution", or "radical red-green new deal (lmao)". frankly, i seriously doubt any non-state or anti-capitalist global "solution" could reduce carbon emissions this drastically and quickly either. best to anticipate continual disaster, build resilient comms/resource networks, and foster a mindset of "solidaristic prepping".

@goldcarrot I find it hard to believe there would still be these emissions if civilization collapsed.

@dysco

except in the case of total annihilation in the case of unbridled nuclear war, civilizational collapse would likely be a long, drawn-out process. i pretty much agree that “no civ=no emissions”, but getting to “no civ” will take a lot longer than 50 years (for better or for worse). total collapse would happen in small bursts and pockets, but there will be no singular apocalypse, and some parts of emissions-heavy civ will be tenacious.

my point should have emphasized “precipitously”.

@goldcarrot so maybe society would break down, but industrial forces would continue, perhaps reverting to their original form where they would lock people inside factories

@dysco

maybe. no doubt civ forces would have to crank up repression, surveillance and labor coercion to maintain itself in the face of a worsening climate.

@dysco

i think we’re likely to see a defacto breakdown of larger state power into micro states. borders harden, society gets tighter, stricter control of life within those spaces, more force used to maintain status quo. however, those civ spaces won’t be able to control everything they used to — the areas of degraded land and abandoned hinterlands may become spaces of non-state, non-civ forms of living.

so i think civ will endure for a while, but while decline and consolidate to save itself.

@dysco

not to sound cliche, but… have you read “Desert”? some good ideas, i’m not totally on board with its orientation, but it’s a solid start to thinking about civ, climate disaster, and the future.

@goldcarrot yep, i listened to a couple audiobooks and read some footnotes. i was thinking about parable of the sower when i replied.

@anarchistbicycleclub yeah wild, remember how many people stopped working on the lockdowns and how little of a dent it made in emissions!

@aaaaargZombies It seemed like the smog lifted all over the world when the work shut down, but that was only a dent in emissions?

@dysco

> global carbon dioxide emissions fell by 6.4%, or 2.3 billion tonnes, in 2020

nature.com/articles/d41586-021

So you can imagine the sort of total transformation of the world as we know it that would be required for net 0.

@anarchistbicycleclub If emissions don't go down many die. But when many die, emissions also go down. It's probably not a perfectly safe dynamic to explore much more.

@mplammers No.
The ones that will die most are not the ones that do most emissions. People in the formerly colonized countries will die in heaps, colonizers will be able to buy air condition and heating and continue to steal resources from the (former) colonies. @anarchistbicycleclub

@anarchistbicycleclub
I fear those in power did give up on 1.5 and are satisfied with 2.0 or more. They can afford private armies or weapons, water, ACs, air filters and expensive, safe environments - or move into space...

@blueplanetslittlehelper I think they don't care for exactly the reasons that you mentioned... @anarchistbicycleclub

@maxi @anarchistbicycleclub The problem is that even "the people" don't seem to care. Or they are manipulated and don't get the information they need to decide on the right path.
We own a terraced house with 100 sqm. The central heating of the entire complex had to be replaced (in was built in 1996). The majority decided (on lacking information, the presentation of 4 different possibilities fi didn't include the energy costs, esp in the future) on a CHP (fossil gas not

@maxi @anarchistbicycleclub
Biogas), which would use more gas than the old gas engine, where we are unable to use or sell all the generated electric power due to burocratic bs in Germany, and where we are locked in fossils for the next 20 years! Not SWH (needs isolated piping to every roof), not geothermal (our! parking spaces) or heat pumps (too loud)... And, of course, the cheapest company (how can they do that, I wonder). We (and every tennant) don't have a choice.

@blueplanetslittlehelper Zu diesem Thema fand ich die Arte Doku "Fake, Forschung, Faule Tricks" sehr interessant. @anarchistbicycleclub

Sign in to participate in the conversation
kolektiva.social

A collective effort to offer federated social media to anarchist collectives and individuals in the fediverse. Registrations are open. Kolektiva.social is made by anarchists and anti-colonialists, for the social movements and for liberation!