Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
This played out a few days ago while I was busy but it was hilarious so I'll share here. So many TERFs have complained about or tried to edit the Posie Parker article, but none have identified any actual issues or factual inaccuracies. When complaining, they seemed to pick the most badass screenshots from my user page as a gotcha. Then a bunch started begging the walking midlife crisis Elon Musk to buy Wikipedia...
One called me a "transactivist who's working on pushing loads of anti-woman stuff." I mean, that's ridiculous in general, but even if you do the mental gymnastics necessary to call the conversion therapy organizations SEGM and Genspect pro-woman (since they call themselves "gender-critical" and that's apparently the same thing), it's not like the IFTCC can be described as anything other than blatant conversion therapy advocates (should be noted that Wikipedia won't let me add the fact that SEGM and Genspect have worked with the IFTCC anyways)
I write every article with the same algorithm: systematically search through every source mentioning the topic and take extensive notes then draft and publish an article. More specifics are on my user page, but they seem to believe I'm spewing propaganda instead of just sticking to reliable sources like the sources themselves aren't critical of them when outside their echo chamber...
I guess, in short, facts don't care about their feelings lol
https://twitter.com/SFWEastSussex/status/1601506926843813888